Saturday, July 29, 2006

Is the Pen Mightier than the Sword?

I believe the pen is indeed mightier than the sword. Man wields both. Where the pen is controlled by Man, the majority rules. Where the sword is controlled by man, the minority rules. Man is at its collective best when celebrating its successes and honestly confronting its failures.

Shakespeare’s ‘Macbeth’ contains the line: "Why should I play the Roman fool, and die on mine own sword?" A query for people who both live and die by the sword. That these words were penned over five hundred years ago speaks volumes.

In a curious way, intelligence is at the heart of the matter. The pen demands intelligence. The sword reprimands intelligence. The pen has aided Man's quest for intelligence. The sword has repressed it.

As a teacher, I have seen the educational power of the pen as our young people learn its language. As a teacher I have also seen the demeaning power of the sword, its cutting edge, as it endangers our families, our schools, and our streets. The pen is carried with pride by young people and used for enrichment. The sword is carried with anger by young people and used to destruct our world. Enrichment prevents anger. I do believe the pen is mightier than the sword.

Do you agree or disagree that the pen is mightier than the sword?

Increase your IQ by BLOGGING!



I came across the above website that really outlines the power of BLOGGING. It's written by a pair of doctors who are "strong advocates for neurologically-based approaches to learning," and they've written a post crediting blogging with doing everything short of curing cancer. According to these Doctors, ‘Blogs’ promote critical thinking, analytical thinking, creative thinking, intuitive thinking, associational thinking, and analogical thinking. Blogs also increase access and exposure to quality information and combine the best of solitary reflection and social interaction.

So if your parents are concerned about the amount of time you are spending online on my TLC BLOGGERS website, perhaps you can direct them to this website and they maybe surprised at some recent findings!


Marriage in later life



People are getting married later in life.

Does this generalisation have any truth to it?

Experimenting with drugs


In today's society, it is said that:


Everyone experiments with drugs these days.


What do you think about this generalisation?

Reduced IQ levels?


People are 'dumber' now compared to 30 years ago.

What do you think about this statement?

Muslims taking over the world?



In light of recent world events, many of us have heard some very pointed generalisations. One is this statement:

Muslims are taking over the world.

What are your opinions about this statement?

An unfriendly nation?


No-one knows their neighbours anymore.


What do you think about this statement?

Is Australia a racist country?


What do you say about this generalisation?

AUSTRALIA IS A RACIST COUNTRY

Friday, July 21, 2006

War in Lebanon


We all can’t help but be aware of the atrocities being committed in Beirut, the capital of Lebanon, at the moment. Every time we switch on the news or turn on the radio, we are subjected to awful images of the situation in the Middle East. The Australian media is of course hot on the action as there are hundreds of Australian citizens trapped in the area, trying to escape the country.

July 13th 2006 - This date signified the bombing of central parts of Beirut's infrastructure, in retaliation of Hezbollah kidnapping of Israeli soldiers. Hezbollah is a militant (a radical) group that has been fighting with Israel for a long time. This group is very strong in the south of Lebanon, in the areas bordering Israel.

It all started on July 12, when Israeli troops were ambushed on Lebanon’s side of the border with Israel. Hezbollah, which is in control in the south of Lebanon, immediately seized the Israeli soldiers on their crossing. They arrested two Israeli soldiers, killed eight Israelis and wounded over 20 in attacks inside Israeli territory.

This unleashed hell in Israel, and the Prime Minister of Israel, Ehud Olmert immediately responded by mounting a war on Lebanon. A sea, air and ground attack was enforced on Lebanon, and a systematic destruction of Lebanon’s infrastructure was began.


US President George W Bush, who commented on Lebanon from Germany 24 hours after violence had spiralled out of control, described the situation as “pathetic”. He also expressed concern that Israel’s attack on Lebanon could threaten or even topple a Lebanese government that Washington supports. His comments have further infuriated and angered Arab communities by expressing Israel’s “right to defend herself”.

This situation is absolutely appalling and angers me to the core. This atrocious attack is a downright sickening attack on human rights and is an inexcusable reaction to a group’s actions that do not speak for all Lebanese people. I have been disgusted watching the news and reading the papers regarding these ‘terrorist’ attacks, as every time I’ve witnessed or heard Israeli bombings, their very first targets are the power stations and water facilities. Then they have taken out bridges and roads and destroying civilian infrastructure (which is a direct violation of the Geneva conventions, just like the indiscriminate bombings).


I’m sickened by this and the U.S. administration, who goes out of it’s way to excuse and protect Israel. I, like most other Australians, was also very disappointed at the time taken to rescue trapped Australians.



What are your opinions on the war in Lebanon?

Do you think Australia has been doing enough to rescue stranded citizens in Lebanon
?

Sunday, July 16, 2006

Assassination of a Dictator

Can the assassination of a dictator be justified?



Before you consider this issue, it maybe useful for you to look at these helpful definitions:
  • Assassination - is the deliberate killing of an important person, usually a political figure or other strategically important individual
  • Dictator - a leader who holds an extraordinary amount of personal power, especially the power to make laws. A leader who displays brutality and oppression in the running of their country
  • Regime - an administration, or a system of control and managing a government
  • Arbitrary - not limited by law
Arguments For:

Many deaths and much suffering could be prevented if one man is killed. The greater good demands a single evil act is done, especially if it would avert the immediate and certain danger of much worse evil. The alternatives to assassination would all leave a dictator in power for many years. In that time not only will many more people suffer under a repressive system, but the policies pursued by an out-of-touch and unrepresentative regime are likely to do serious (if unintentional) harm to the whole nation and its economy, making eventual rebuilding much more costly in both human and economic terms.

Arguments Against:

Murder can never be justified. If we assume the role of executioner without the backing of law, we are sinking down to the level of the dictators. Any new government founded upon such an arbitrary act will lack moral legitimacy, undermining its popular support and making its failure likely. By assuming the power to take life arbitrarily, even in an apparently good cause, we cheapen the value of life itself. Many terrorists, criminals, or indeed dictators could and have claimed similar legitimacy for their violent actions. Only if we ourselves respect human rights absolutely, will our promotion of these values seem valid to others.

Where do you stand with this issue?

Do you believe it is ok to assassinate a dictator?

Private Lives of Public Figures

Should the private lives of public figures (movie/film /tv stars)
be open to media / press scrutiny?

Assisted Suicide / Voluntary Euthanasia


Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of an individual (who is suffering from a terminal disease or a chronically painful condition) in a painless or minimally painful way. This can be done by either a lethal injection, drug overdose, or by the withdrawal of medical support.

Debate about the morality and legality of voluntary euthanasia has been, for the most part, a phenomenon of the second half of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty first century.

Some say that it is the right thing to do to help people who desire a hastened death so as to avoid further suffering. Some say it is morally and ethically wrong to kill another human being. At present, it is against the law to practice Euthanasia / Assisted suicide.

Is Euthanasia something you agree with? Should assisted suicide be legalised?

Abortion: For or against?


Should abortion be permitted?

PE in schools


Should Physical Education in schools be compulsory?

Animals in Sports and Entertainment



Should human beings be allowed to use other animals as objects of sport and entertainment?

Monday, July 10, 2006

Big Brother scandal


Recently, 2 Big Brother contestants were escorted from the set of the reality television program amid allegations of sexual misconduct.

Do you believe this show should be taken off the air, due to breaching a code of conduct? Why or why not?

The need for mankind ...



'Non-violence is the answer to the crucial political and moral questions of our time; the need for mankind to overcome oppression and violence without resorting to oppression and violence. Mankind must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love.'

Martin Luther King Jr., December 11, 1964
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you think Martin Luther King Jr meant by these words?
Is this quote still applicable for today?